Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment




Vol 9, Issue 1,2011
Online ISSN: 1459-0263
Print ISSN: 1459-0255


Relative drought tolerance of various desert saltgrass (Distichlis spicata) genotypes


Author(s):

Mohammad Pessarakli 1*, Kenneth B. Marcum 2, Yahya Emam 3

Recieved Date: 2010-11-09, Accepted Date: 2011-01-10

Abstract:

Desertification of arable lands due to urbanization, global warming, and low rainfall mandates water conservation and using low quality waters for irrigation. Using low quality irrigation water imposes more stress on plants which are already under stress in these regions. Thus, there is an urgent need for finding drought tolerant plants to survive under water deficit conditions. The objectives of this study were to find the most drought tolerant saltgrass genotypes for use in arid regions, where limited water supplies coupled with saline soils result in drought/salinity stresses, for use in urban landscapes. Various saltgrass genotypes were studied to evaluate their growth responses under progressive drought stress. Drought stress was imposed via a competitive dry down technique. Drought tolerance was ascertained by relative shoot dry weight and green leaf area. Though all the grasses showed a high level of drought tolerance, there was a wide range of variations observed in their stress tolerance levels. Overall, the results (clipping dry weights and the percent of the visual green cover) showed that the A138 and A137 (Arizona accessions) were the most drought tolerant accessions and the C10 and C66 (Colorado accessions) were the least tolerant ones. In regards to drought tolerance, the rest of the grass accessions were between these two groups. Most of the saltgrass accessions were more tolerant to drought stress than the bermudagrass. Bermudagrass reached full dormancy and/or necrosis stage before most of the saltgrass accessions.

Keywords:

Desert regions, drought stress, saltgrass, dry matter, percent canopy green cover, urban landscaping


Journal: Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment
Year: 2011
Volume: 9
Issue: 1
Category: Environment
Pages: 474-478


Full text for Subscribers
Information:

Note to users

The requested document is freely available only to subscribers/registered users with an online subscription to the Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment. If you have set up a personal subscription to this title please enter your user name and password. All abstracts are available for free.

Article purchasing

If you like to purchase this specific document such as article, review or this journal issue, contact us. Specify the title of the article or review, issue, number, volume and date of the publication. Software and compilation, Science & Technology, all rights reserved. Your use of this website details or service is governed by terms of use. Authors are invited to check from time to time news or information.


Purchase this Article:   20 Purchase PDF Order Reprints for 15

Share this article :